Panthropic abuse is Schrodinger’s Role made absolute

Panthropic abuse is the absolute persecution of ego-formation and ownership, enforced from the very beginning—before birth—through externally imposed frameworks that dictate every aspect of existence. It is not about repression/oppression or erasure, because there was never an allowed ego to suppress or erase. It is total preemptive negation—an ontological nullification—where the person is engineered, not merely controlled.

The individual is not recognized as an autonomous being but is instead forced into a predetermined role that serves external interests. This role is not a static identity but a dynamic function, manipulated at will by those in power. The external system does not merely influence or shape the person—it dictates their entire existence, leaving no space for personal volition, self-actualization, or even internal ownership.

Panthropic abuse is Schrodinger’s Role made absolute. The person both exists and does not exist, forced to endure without being permitted to be. It is a state where everything is real, and everything is mutually exclusive—a paradox engineered to maintain absolute control. 

Schrödinger's Role, refers to Schrödinger's cat 

Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment devised by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935 to illustrate the paradoxes and counterintuitive nature of quantum mechanics, particularly the concept of superposition. It was intended as a critique of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which suggests that particles exist in all possible states simultaneously until observed.

The Setup:

1. A cat is placed inside a sealed box.

1. The box contains:

• A radioactive atom with a 50% chance of decaying within an hour.

• A Geiger counter to detect radioactive decay.

• A vial of poison that will be released if the Geiger counter detects decay.

1. The cat's fate depends entirely on whether the radioactive atom decays:

• If the atom decays, the Geiger counter triggers the release of poison, killing the cat.

• If the atom does not decay, the cat remains alive.

The Paradox:
According to quantum mechanics, the radioactive atom exists in a superposition of decayed and undecayed states until it is measured or observed. By extension, this implies that the cat is simultaneously both dead and alive inside the box until someone opens it and observes the outcome.
Implications:
Schrödinger's cat illustrates the strangeness of quantum superposition and the problem of measurement in quantum mechanics. It raises questions about the role of observation in determining the state of a quantum system and whether superposition applies to macroscopic objects like cats.
Schrödinger himself introduced the idea to highlight what he saw as the absurdity of applying quantum mechanics to everyday objects, sparking ongoing philosophical and scientific debates. 

Cristina Gherghel

Researcher | Theorist of Ontological Foreclosure, Specific Affective Absence, and Structural Consciousness
For complementary insights and further reading: 

🔹 Neurodivergent as It Is — Exploring Neurological Realities Without Reductionism in Romanian
🔹 Cristina Gherghel Research —Panthropic Abuse and Ontological Trauma
🔹 Philosophy of paradoxes

You can also discover all my books here.

New Definition of Panthropic Abuse, Mind Control and Existential Trauma

Panthropic abuse is an absolute, systemic, and totalizing form of domination inflicted from birth, with the goal of obliterating individuality, autonomy, and selfhood. Unlike conventional abuse, it is not reactive or chaotic—it is strategic, deliberate, and engineered by psychopathic perpetrators who see the target as an instrument rather than a person.

This form of abuse begins at birth, as the abuser does not wait for traits to emerge in the child but instead imposes a preordained identity—or rather, a non-identity—designed solely to serve their needs. There is no allowance for natural development, no space for the target to form desires, instincts, or attachments. Every thought, emotion, and action is dictated externally, ensuring that the target functions as a tool, never as an autonomous being.

The hackeronomous psyche (prior called "avantistic mind") refers to a psyche that is externally programmed rather than self-generated. The target does not develop an internal world of their own but instead operates within the constructs imposed by the abuser. This is distinct from conditioning because it does not involve adaptation, survival, or internalized defense mechanisms. There is no room for personal agency—only the dictated structure imposed by the abuser.

The moral compass in panthropic abuse is not something developed or chosen by the target but something coerced and installed. It is a moral framework that serves the abuser’s needs, ensuring that the target remains in their designated role. Compassion, kindness, and any other "virtues" are not organic traits but functions demanded for the abuser’s exploitation and control.

The defining elements of panthropic abuse include:

• Preordained Instrumentalization: The target is not merely controlled but created for a purpose, engineered from birth to fulfill a role.
• Total Denial of Selfhood: Unlike other forms of abuse, which may involve neglect or suppression, panthropic abuse prevents the target from ever forming an ego at all.
• Precision-Based Sadism: The abuse is calculated, not chaotic. The abuser understands exactly how much to push, ensuring the target never "breaks" in a way that renders them useless.
• Eradication of Instincts and Cognition: The target is denied sensory, emotional, and cognitive autonomy, typically resulting in imposed states such as aphantasia, anhedonia, and asexuality.
• Tacit Collusion of Others: In cases where there are multiple targets, the rest of the family operates under an unspoken rule that the primary target must never receive recognition, support, or acknowledgment. 

Panthropic abuse is not just control—it is total domination. It does not allow for rebellion, survival tactics, or even the illusion of choice. It is the forced existence of a being whose only function is to endure and serve. 

Panthropic Abuse and Existential Trauma

Panthropic abuse is distinct in its foundational nature. It is not defined by cycles of harm interspersed with care, nor does it leave room for the relational dynamics essential for human development. Instead, it is characterized by the preemptive interception of the child's ability to form an ego. 

From birth, the child is forcibly confined to an imposed identity, crafted solely to serve the abuser's needs. There is no space for individuality, no capacity for mutuality, and no possibility of self-affirmation. The abuse constructs an avantistic mind: an artificial moral framework of imposed servitude, designed to endure without autonomy, relational tools, or recognition of malice. 

Unlike other forms of abuse, panthropic abuse does not damage an existing self; it prevents ego formation. There is no "before" or natural development to be interrupted—only an existence defined entirely by the abuser's domination. The imposed identity is not a distorted or adapted self but an artificial construct, annihilating the child's potential for humanity, selfhood, and relationality.

Three central concepts form the basis of this framework:

• Primal Negation: The total and foundational denial of the child’s relational existence, preventing the formation of any autonomous identity or recognition.
• Avantistic Mind: A coerced moral framework of radical servitude, constructed to align entirely with the abuser’s needs, devoid of personal agency, relationality, or choice.
• Imposed Identity: The artificial construct forced upon the child, preventing the natural emergence of an ego and ensuring total subjugation.

This framework rejects conventional abuse models that rely on resilience, recovery, or attachment dynamics. Such terms presume a self capable of adapting or healing—a possibility denied to those subjected to panthropic abuse. Instead, this work seeks to articulate the inarticulable: what it means to exist without recognition, relationality, or a foundation for selfhood in a world that demands them.

Coming soon