About

This blog serves as a repository for 25 years of meticulous research into a form of abuse that remains unacknowledged in academic discourse. My work is a dynamic, evolving endeavor—a work in progress that will likely continue even after I formalize and publish my conclusions. I fully anticipate resistance, critique, and dismissal from those who encounter my research.

I harbor no illusions about gaining acceptance or recognition within academic circles. I am keenly aware of my position: no credentials, no formal academic training, and no institutional backing. By conventional standards, I am "unqualified" to challenge the established frameworks of abuse and trauma. For 24 years, I acquiesced to these frameworks, aligning my observations with their paradigms and silencing the discordant truths that failed to fit. I bowed to the authority of existing models, suppressing the language and insights that sought to surface.

However, at 49, it became unequivocally clear that the phenomenon I articulate lies outside these frameworks. My research does not merely defy categorization; it demands a new epistemic lens, one that confronts the ontological limitations of prevailing paradigms.

If traditional psychological research can be likened to Schrödinger's cat—a thought experiment designed to probe the boundaries of interpretation—my research extends this analogy into a stark reality. It is not a hypothetical; it is lived, embodied, and undeniable. My work is not a mere philosophical exercise but a visceral challenge to the boundaries of what psychology dares to examine.

I am not attempting to fit within existing academic structures but to document a phenomenon that transcends them. This work is not about recognition; it is about truth, no matter how inconvenient or unacknowledged it may remain.